AW School Law Blog — AW Law

2025 Ohio Summer Camp List

Summer camp is a longstanding tradition that provides a unique opportunity for children to embark on exciting adventures, make lasting memories, and develop crucial life skills. Summer camp serves as a chance for children to step outside their comfort zones and discover their independence. These unique experiences provided by summer camps build resilience and prepare children to face challenges with confidence.

We are pleased to provide a compiled list of various summer camps and programs available to children across Ohio.

* - inclusive of children of all abilities/programs may be modified)
** - requires diagnosis to attend
*** - requires diagnosis but is inclusive to typically-developing siblings and peers

Northeast Ohio (including Cleveland, Akron, Canton, and Youngstown)

  1. Akron ArtWorks
    Akron, Ohio
    Type: Art
    Ages: 7-14 years

  2. Akron Rotary Camp**
    Akron, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 6-21 years

  3. Bellwether Farm Summer Camps
    Wakeman, Ohio
    Grades: 3-12
    Type: Traditional, Religious

  4. Bright Futures Preschool Summer Program*
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 3-5 years

  5. Camp Cheerful by Achievement Centers for Children*
    Strongsville, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 5 years through Graduation

  6. Camp Cornerstone
    Independence, Ohio
    Type: Specialty (Bereavement)
    Ages: 6-12 years

  7. Camp Curiosity at Great Lakes Science Center
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Type: STEM
    Grades: K-6

  8. Camp Frederick
    Rogers, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: K-10

  9. Camp Gilmour at Gilmour Academy
    Gates Mills, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Academic
    Ages: 3-12 years

  10. Camp Happiness by Catholic Charities Diocese of Cleveland**
    Wickliffe, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 5-18 years

  11. Camp Ho Mita Koda**
    Newbury Township, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Grades: K-12

  12. Camp Nuhop**
    Perrysville, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 6-29 years

  13. Cedarbrook Camp of Ohio at Stony Glen
    Madison, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Religious
    Grades: 1-12

  14. Common Ground Center Summer Camps
    Oberlin, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Adventure
    Ages: 6-15 years

  15. FACEtime Summer Camp at Cleveland Hearing & Speech Center**

    Cleveland, Ohio
    Type: Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 9-16 years

  16. Falcon Camp
    Carrollton, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 6-16 years

  17. Kids Summer Camp at LifeCenter Plus Health and Fitness Center
    Hudson, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 5-12 years

  18. Red Oak Camp
    Kirtland, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Horse
    Grades: 1-10

  19. SMILE Summer Camp at Peak Potential Therapy
    Northfield, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Therapeutic, Specialty (Disability Support)**
    Ages: 6-16 years

  20. Thrive Summer Camp at Therapy & Wellness Connection*
    Brecksville, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Therapeutic, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: Children of all ages

Central/Southeast Ohio (including Columbus and Athens)

  1. Camp Architecture and Design at Columbus Center for Architecture and Design
    Columbus, Ohio
    Type: STEM
    Grades: 3-8

  2. Camp Echoing Hills***
    Warsaw, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 7-Adulthood

  3. Camp Hamwi by the Central Ohio Diabetes Association**
    Danville, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 7-17

  4. Camp Nuhop**
    Perrysville, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 6-29 years

  5. Camp Wyandot
    Westerville and Hocking Hills, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Adventure
    Grades: K-12

  6. Day Camp and Kindergarten Enrichment at Enchanted Care Learning
    Greater Columbus Area, Ohio (7 locations)
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: K-6

  7. IDEAS Summer Camps for Boys & Girls

    Columbus, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: Preschool-8

  8. RAW Camp at Rising Appalachia
    Millfield, Ohio
    Type: Adventure
    Ages: 6-17 years

  9. Recreation Unlimited Camps***
    Ashley, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 5-22

  10. Summer Camps and Programs at BalletMet
    Columbus, Ohio
    Type: Dance
    Ages: 4-8 years

  11. Summer Challenge Day Camp at Central Community House**
    Columbus, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: K-5

  12. Summer Experience at Columbus Academy
    Gahanna, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Academic
    Grades: Preschool-12

Southwest Ohio (including Cincinnati and Dayton)

  1. Abrakadoodle Art Camps for Kids
    Greater Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Art
    Ages: 2-14 years

  2. Aullwood Summer Earth Adventure
    Dayton, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Adventure
    Ages: 5-12

  3. Camp Ashreinu
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 1.5 years-Grade 7

  4. Camp Chabad
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Religious
    Ages: 5-13

  5. Cincinnati Reds Baseball & Softball Camps
    Various Locations in Central and Southeast, Ohio
    Type: Sports
    Ages: 6-14 years

  6. Cincinnati Shakespeare’s Theatre Summer Camp
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Theatre
    Grades: 1-12

  7. Dayton Live Creative Academy Summer Camp
    Dayton, Ohio
    Type: Performing Arts
    Ages: 4-18

  8. Gorman Heritage Farm’s Summer Day Camp
    Evendale, Ohio
    Type: Specialty (Farm and Animals)
    Ages: 5-13 years

  9. Great Parks Day Camps
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 3-17 Years

  10. Images of Afrika Summer Camp at Bi-Okoto
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Culture
    Ages: 6-12 years

  11. Museum Camps at the Cincinnati Museum Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: K-6th

  12. Ohio Sports Academy Summer Camps
    Springboro, Ohio
    Type: Sports
    Ages: 4-12 years

  13. Saint Ursula Academy (SAU) Summer Academy
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: 3-8

  14. Summer Art Camp at the Taft Museum of Art
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Art
    Grades: 1-12

  15. Summer Camps at Best Point Education and Behavioral Health*
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional, Specialty (Disability Support)
    Ages: 4-25 years

  16. Summer Camps at Green County Parks and Trails
    Xenia, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 3-13 years

  17. Ursuline Academy Summer Camps
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: 1-9

Northwest Ohio (including Toledo and Sandusky)

  1. Bellweather Farm Summer Camps
    Wakeman, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: 2-12

  2. Courageous Community Services’ Courageous Acres*

    Whitehouse, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Ages: 5 years-Adulthood

  3. Imagination Station Summer Camp

    Toledo, Ohio
    Type: STEM
    Ages: 6-13 years

  4. Path Finders Camp

    Toledo, Ohio
    Type: Therapeutic, Specialty (Bereavement)
    Ages: 6-15 years

  5. Summer Camps at the Notre Dame Academy

    Toledo, Ohio
    Type: Traditional
    Grades: K-9

Online Summer Camps

  1. National Computer Camps Virtual Online Camp
    Type: STEM
    Ages: 8-18 years

  2. STEAM Camps at MehtA+ Tutoring
    Type: STEM, Art
    Grades: 5-12

Please note that this list does not capture the endless opportunities for summer programming available to children. For more programs, be sure to check out your local YMCA, Jewish Community Center (JCC), Boys and Girls Club, Brightside Academy Ohio, Salvation Army, Easterseals, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, Camp Invention, Code Ninjas, Classroom Antics, Challenge Island, Snapology, college, university, zoo, or recreation center. Have an AWesome summer and stay safe!

Compiled by Renee Stromski, Esq., Updated by Elisabeth Evers

Need help with your Special Education matter? Call us: 614-745-2001

Share

Religious Expression Days

Taking effect on March 10, 2025, each school district board of education must adopt a policy that will allow K-12 students to be absent from school for up to three days each academic year for “religious expression days.” The policy would ensure that those absences would be considered excused and cause no academic penalty for the student. The policy will also allow for the student to participate in interscholastic athletics or other extracurricular activities on days the student is otherwise absent for a “religious expression day.”

The school district must make alternative accommodations for missed exams or any other required work so long as the parent or guardian notifies the school principal in writing within 14 school days of the first day of school or within 14 days or enrolling at a new school. While the principal may not approve more than three written requests per year, they must approve the three requests “without inquiry into the sincerity of a student’s religious or spiritual belief system.” What the school principal is allowed to do before approving a student’s “religious expression day” is confirm with the parent or guardian making the request. A principal may deny a request, but only if there have been more than three requests in an academic year or the parent or guardian denies making the request.

By March 10, 2025, each district must comply and have adopted a new policy that is posted on the district’s website with a point of contact for questions about the policy, and include procedures for a student or guardian to notify the school of any grievances. Additionally, a nonexhaustive list of major religious holidays, festivals, and religious observations must be included on the website. Such policy is also to be shared with parents annually. Lastly, “religious expression days” may not be considered in calculations of absentee hours.

https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-3320.04/3-10-2025

Written by paralegal Jennifer McGarry at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

Share

Applied Behavior Analysis: A Comprehensive Overview

Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is a therapeutic approach designed to modify behavior through evidence-based techniques. Behaviorism, popularized by John B. Watson in 1913, laid the groundwork for ABA. Then, in the 1930s, B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning concept highlighted reinforcement's role in behavior change. The 1960s saw the application of these principles to real-world settings, spearheaded by Dr. Lovaas. While some early practices, like punishment-based techniques, have been deemed unethical, modern ABA emphasizes ethical standards and positive reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB), established in 1998, ensures that practitioners adhere to rigorous ethical guidelines.

Since its inception in the 1960s, ABA has been instrumental in assisting children with autism and related developmental disorders. Its primary aim is to enhance positive behaviors and diminish undesirable ones across various settings, including home, school, and community environments.

ABA focuses on teaching practical skills and fostering meaningful behavior changes by adapting to individual needs. The therapy often employs one-on-one sessions to achieve personalized outcomes. A cornerstone of ABA is positive reinforcement, where desired behaviors are followed by rewards that are meaningful to the individual, such as praise, food, toys, or access to preferred activities. This approach strengthens the likelihood of the behavior being repeated.

This process typically starts with identifying a goal behavior; a therapist determines specific skills or behaviors to be targeted. Next, the therapist will use the child’s preferences to develop a reward menu. They will use these rewards to provide immediate reinforcement when the child demonstrates the desired behavior. Over time, the frequency of rewards is adjusted to encourage sustained behavior changes. 

ABA therapists use the ABC model to analyze and influence behavior. This framework includes:

·         Antecedent: The event or environment preceding the behavior. 

·         Behavior: The individual's response or lack thereof.

·         Consequence: The result following the behavior, such as reinforcement or no reaction.

For example, if a teacher instructs a student to clean up and the student responds by yelling, ABA would involve modifying antecedents and consequences to teach a more appropriate response, like asking for extra time to clean up.

ABA aims to help individuals develop skills that promote independence and success in everyday life. Goals are customized to the individual’s abilities, preferences, and family dynamics and may include:

·         Communication and language

·         Social interactions

·         Self-care routines

·         Play and leisure activities

·         Motor skills

·         Academic learning

These skills are broken down into manageable steps, taught incrementally from simple to complex, to ensure measurable progress.

A Board-Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) oversees ABA programs. They start with a comprehensive assessment of the individual's skills and needs. Treatment goals are established based on this evaluation, and progress is monitored through data collection during therapy sessions. Regular reviews with families and staff allow for adjustments to teaching plans and goals. Typically, Registered Behavior Technicians (RBTs), supervised by BCBAs, deliver the therapy and collect the data.

ABA is recognized as an evidence-based best practice by the U.S. Surgeon General and the American Psychological Association. More than 20 studies have demonstrated its efficacy, particularly for intensive, long-term therapy (25-40 hours per week for 1-3 years). Documented benefits include improvements in intellectual functioning, language, daily living skills, and social behaviors. Although fewer studies focus on adults, the results also suggest positive benefits.

Despite its widespread use, ABA has faced criticism from some parents and autistic self-advocates. Concerns include:

·         A perceived overemphasis on eliminating behaviors rather than building skills.

·         Insufficient focus on understanding the causes of behaviors.

·         A clinical approach that may not generalize well to naturalistic settings.

·         Allegations of promoting neurotypical standards over individual authenticity.

Proponents of ABA counter this argument by stating that ABA’s focus is not on “curing” autism but on enhancing quality of life and independence.

ABA has been a focal point in legal decisions related to providing a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). Courts have occasionally mandated ABA as essential for meeting the unique needs of students with autism. However, districts vary in their willingness to incorporate ABA into Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), and some parents have resorted to funding private ABA therapy. Important cases on the matter include: R.T. et al. (2006) v. Henrico County Public Schools, VA; T.H. v. Board of Education of Palatine Community Consolidated School District 15 (1998); and Dong v. Board of Education of the Rochester Community Schools, 197 F.3d 793 (1999).

Many private insurance plans cover ABA therapy when deemed medically necessary, not educationally necessary. Medicaid is required to fund ABA for individuals under 21 if prescribed by a physician. Coverage details depend on state regulations and insurance policies. Lastly, some insurance carriers only allow an RBT to provide services in the school setting, not a BCBA.

In conclusion, ABA is a dynamic, evidence-based approach that emphasizes positive reinforcement to achieve meaningful behavior changes. While it has proven benefits, ongoing dialogue with families and self-advocates is essential to address concerns and refine practices. Ultimately, ABA strives to empower individuals to lead fulfilling lives, emphasizing skill development and personal growth.

Written by advocate Danielle Randolph at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

The Intersection of Student Privacy and Special Education

What are the laws about educational records?

When it comes to your child’s educational records, there are a few laws that come into play.

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”)

The purpose of FERPA is to protect parent and student privacy.[1] FERPA applies to all students.[2]  FERPA grants parents the right to inspect and review their child’s educational records[3] and to request an amendment to their child’s educational records[4], and it prohibits school districts from disclosing personally identifiable information without parent consent (with some limited exceptions).[5] When reviewing educational records, FERPA also requires the District to “respond to reasonable requests for explanations and interpretation of education records.”[6] This means if you have questions about the records you’re reviewing, you can (and should!) request that the District explain and interpret those records for you, and the District has to respond, so long as your question is reasonable (i.e. related to the documents you’re reviewing).

FERPA defines an educational record as, “those records that are: (1) Directly related to a student; and (2) Maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a party acting for the agency or institution.”[7] Looking at that definition a little more closely, a record is “any information recorded in any way, including, but not limited to, handwriting, print, computer media, video or audio tape, film, microfilm and microfiche.”[8] While FERPA doesn’t specifically define what it means to be “directly related to a student,” this is generally considered to include any record with personally identifiable information regarding a student. Personally identifiable information includes not only a student and parent’s names, their address, or other specific identifier (such as birth date or social security number), but also, “other information that, alone or in combination, is linked or linkable to a specific student that would allow a reasonable person in the school community, who does not have personal knowledge of the relevant circumstances, to identify the student with reasonable certainty” and “information requested by a person who the [school district] reasonably believes knows the identify of the student to whom the education record relates.”[9]

While “maintained” is also not defined by FERPA, the United States Supreme Court has defined it as, “to keep in existence or continuance; preserve; retain."[10]  The Court further noted that "[t]he word 'maintain' suggests FERPA records will be kept in a filing cabinet in a records room at the school or on a permanent secure database, perhaps even after the student is no longer enrolled." Id. at 433 (emphasis added). 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”)

IDEA is a civil rights law regarding students with disabilities, providing specific rules and rights for ensuring these students receive a free and appropriate public education. One of these rights includes the right to inspect and review records.[11] This applies to all records that are, “collected, maintained, or used” by the school district.[12] In addition to simply inspecting and reviewing the records, IDEA also gives parents the following rights:

(1)    The right to an explanation and interpretation of the records;

(2)    The right to copies, only if failure to do so would prevent you from inspecting and reviewing the records; and

(3)    The right to have a representative inspect and review the records.[13]

IDEA also requires school districts to, upon request, provide parents “a list of the types and locations of education records collected, maintained, or used by the agency.”[14]

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“Section 504”)

Under Section 504, parents must also be given an opportunity to “examine relevant records” regarding the student.[15] While section 504 does not define “relevant records,” the office of civil rights has given examples such as, " evaluation reports, report cards, a Section 504 plan, discipline records, and health records.”[16]

What do educational records have to do with testing records?

Testing records are, or at least they can be, educational records. So long as they contain personally identifiable information about your child (i.e. are related to the student), and are maintained by the District, the testing records are educational records. However, if there is no personally identifiable information, it is not.[17]  For example, if your child is given an intelligence test, such as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and he either personally writes his information in an answer booklet with his name on it, or the evaluator records his answers on an answer booklet with your child’s name on it, that document is now considered an educational record. However, if the questions given to your child and/or the instructions are on a different document that does not have any personally identifiable information regarding your child on it, that document would not be an educational record.

While neither FERPA nor Section 504 specify how long these records must be kept before being destroyed, if your child receives services under IDEA, the Districts must inform you when records that are maintained, used, or collected are no longer needed for the child’s educational services.[18] While it’s up to the District when the records are no longer needed, they still must inform you of that decision and, if you request to inspect the records, they cannot destroy them while the request is pending. Further, under Section 504, although there is no similar requirement that the District notify you before destroying records, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has repeatedly found that District policies related to destroying testing protocols and scoring sheets, to the extent they are educational records, denied parents access to “all relevant records,” in violation of Section 504.[19]

Michigan has specific rules regarding the maintenance of testing records that go beyond the protections of IDEA and Section 504, to apply to both general education and special education students. In Michigan, student standardized testing data (records that document test scores and analysis for standardized tests that were taken by individual students) must be maintained until five years after the student graduates.[20] Summary testing data (records that document student performance on standardized tests; such reports document the scores of all students in the building who took the test) must be kept until five years after the date it was created.  For other states, you can generally find information regarding record retention schedules by searching “records retention and disposal schedule for [your state’s] public schools” via an internet search.

To the extent testing protocols and answer booklets are educational records, you have the right to review and inspect them. The biggest challenge you may face in requesting to review these documents is copyright concerns. However, so long as you are inspecting the records in person, this should not apply as the District is maintaining control and custody over the documents.[21] If you are seeking copies, this is a much more difficult burden to overcome. While there may be some exceptions for when copies must be provided, such as for due process hearings to ensure a fair hearing and appropriate representation by counsel,[22] in general both courts and OCR have found Districts to have complied with their obligations under FERPA, IDEA, and OCR where parents have been given an appropriate opportunity to inspect the records.[23]

Why is this important to me and my child with a disability?

Testing records can be a key tool when advocating for the appropriate identification, placement, or services for your child.  To use testing records to advocate for your child, first gather all relevant test results.  Then, analyze the data to identify strengths and weaknesses.  Finally, use specific details from the records to clearly communicate your child's educational needs to school officials, highlighting areas where additional support or accommodations might be necessary. 

Key steps to effectively use testing records for advocacy:

1. Obtain copies of all relevant testing data:

  • This includes standardized achievement tests, ability tests, diagnostic assessments, and any other relevant evaluations your child has taken.[24]

  • Make a list of all the testing your child has completed recently, and send a written request to the District to review and inspect all testing protocols and answer booklets related to these evaluations that contain personally identifiable information, as these are educational records pertaining to your child’s education.

2. Review and understand the test results:

  • Learn the meaning of the scores, percentiles, and other metrics used in the testing reports. Look for consistent strengths and weaknesses across different tests to get a comprehensive picture of your child's learning profile. Also look for specific areas of concern within the itemized answers your child provided.

  • If you have any questions about what you are reviewing, ask the District to provide someone who can explain the meaning of the information, how the test was administered, the resulting scores, etc. so you can fully understand the information presented.

  • Bring a notebook when you go to review the documents, so you can take specific notes on your review and, as applicable, conversation with District staff explaining the records.  

3. Compare progress over time: if your child has taken similar tests in the past, compare their scores to show areas of growth or stagnation. Repeat steps 1 & 2 for future tests to continue comparing your child’s growth or stagnation.

4. Communicate clearly with the school: after reviewing the testing records and your notes, explain how the test results impact your child's learning in the classroom and how specific interventions or accommodations could address those needs. You can do this in writing or request a meeting to discuss your concerns and, as appropriate, revise your child’s IEP or 504 plan.

5. Be prepared to ask questions and make specific requests: during meetings with school officials, be ready to ask questions about the test results and how they will be used to inform your child's educational plan. Examples of specific requests include:

  • For a child with reading difficulties: if standardized tests show significant gaps in reading comprehension, use the specific data points to advocate for additional reading interventions or a reading specialist.

  • For a gifted child: if a test indicates high potential in specific areas, use the results to request enrichment activities or acceleration opportunities.

  • For a child with learning disabilities: if a diagnostic evaluation identifies a learning disability, use the test findings to advocate for accommodations or special education services.

During advocacy discussions with the school, remember to present your information constructively – focused on solutions and potential interventions based on the test results.  The goal is to advocate for appropriate identification, placement, or services for your child using the information discovered during your review of testing protocols or other education records.

What happens if the District refuses my request to review records, or says the records don’t exist?

If the District denies your request to review records, or claims the specific records are not educational records, you have the right to file a complaint under FERPA. In general, you have 180 days to file a complaint from when the District denies your request to review and inspect the records. Information on FERPA’s complaint process can be found here: https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/file-a-complaint.

If the District says the records do not exist, or similarly denies the records are educational records, and you have a child with a disability receiving services under IDEA, you can file a state or due process complaint. For a state complaint, you have 1 year from the date you learned of the violation to file your complaint. The state will then investigate your complaint and issue a decision within 60 days; you also have an opportunity to participate in mediation to resolve your concerns. For a due process complaint, you will present your allegations in front of an administrative law judge, similar to a civil trial, and the judge will decide if the District violated IDEA. More information on these dispute resolution processes in Michigan can be found here https://www.michigan.gov/mde/services/special-education/dispute-resolution-options. For other states, check your department of education’s website for information on their dispute resolution processes. Because due process is considered a formal legal proceeding with strict timelines to be followed, and because the District will be represented by an attorney, while you do have the right to represent yourself, we highly recommend retaining an attorney or at least consulting with an attorney before filing on your own.

If your child is receiving services under IDEA or Section 504, you can also file a complaint with OCR. Information regarding OCR’s complaint process can be found here: https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/civil-rights-laws/file-complaint.

In all cases, or if you have any other questions about reviewing and using testing records, you can reach out to an education attorney.

[1] See 34 CFR 99.2.

[2] See 34 CFR 99.3; 20 U.S.C. 1232g; 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(6).

[3] See 34 CFR 99.10-99.12.

[4] See 34 CFR 99.20-99.22.

[5] See 34 CFR 99.30-99.39.

[6] See Letter to Shuster, 108 LRP 2302 (OSEP 2007); 34 CFR 100.S62(b)(I); 34 CFR 99.10(c).

[7] 34 CFR 99.3; 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(4).

[8] 34 CFR 99.3.

[9] Id.

[10] Owasso Indep Sch Dist No. I-011 v Falvo, 534 U.S. 426, 433; 122 S Ct 934; 151 L Ed 2d 896 (2002) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

[11] 34 CFR 300.613.

[12] 34 CFR 300.613(a).

[13] 34 CFR 300.613(b).

[14] 34 CFR 300.616.

[15] 34 CFR 104.36.

[16] Parent and Educator Resource Guide to Section 504 in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, U.S. Dept. of Educ. Office for Civil Rights (Dec. 2016), available at https://www.ed.gov/media/document/504-resource-guide-201612pdf#:~:text=The%20Meaning%20of%20Disability%20Under%20Section%20504,-Major%20life%20activities&text=Major%20bodily%20functions%20are%20also,%C2%A7%2012102(2)).

[17] See Letter to Shuster, 108 LRP 2302 (OSEP 2007).

[18] 34 CFR 300.624(a).

[19] See St. Charles (IL) Community School District No. 303, 17 IDELR 16 (OCR 1990); Pawtucket (RI) School District, 111 LRP 16103 (OCR 12/17/10).

[20] https://www.michigan.gov/-/media/Project/Websites/dtmb/Services/Records-Management/RMS_GS2.pdf?rev=6bab3a5ee5544a479e9cb969e7a53de8

[21] See Letter to Price, 57 IDELR 50 (OSEP 2010).

[22] See Tri-County (IL) Special Educ. Coop., 257 IDELR 529 (OCR 1984).

[23] See In re: Child with a Disability, 505 IDELR 215 (SEA IL 1983); Supra Note 20Doe v. Arlington County School Board, 30 IDELR 362 (E.D. Va. 1999), aff’d, 32 IDELR 58 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 115 LRP 3585, 531 U.S. 824 (2000), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in N.L. v. Knox County Schools, 38 IDELR 62 (6th Cir. 2003); Kenilworth Board of Education, 106 LRP 2627 (SEA NJ 06/15/00); Arapahoe 5, Cherry Creek School District, 113 LRP 2895 (SEA CO 12/17/12). 

[24] Parents can request to review records by submitting a letter to the school. Disability Rights Michigan offers several sample form letters to use when requesting records.  See https://www.drmich.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/DRM_guide_chap2_2020.pdf.

  Written by attorney Jacquelyn Kmetz and law clerk Lorraine Harmer at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

http://www.Lawyers4Students.com

Public Education Funding in Pennsylvania: Past, Present, and Future

Introduction 

            Thomas Jefferson famously espoused that “an enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic.” He believed that the survival of our Republic was critically dependent upon the education of all citizens.  The necessity of public education remains a core belief that is axiomatic for most Americans today. 

Although the right to an education is not explicitly contained within the United States Constitution, it is deeply rooted in Pennsylvania Constitutional history, dating as far back as William Penn’s 1681 Frame of Government, the Commonwealth’s first charter.  Penn believed that no cost should be spared in providing for education, and this principle has been carried through to subsequent iterations of the Pennsylvania Constitution in 1790, 1838, and 1874. The current Education Clause, voted on in 1967, provides: “The General Assembly shall provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education to serve the needs of the Commonwealth.” Pa. Const. art. III, § 14.

In order to effectuate this constitutional mandate, a system of public education has evolved which serves more than 1.7 million K-12 students and includes 500 school districts, over 160 brick-and-mortar charter schools, 14 cyber charter schools, 29 Intermediate Units, and 84 career and technical education centers.  Ideally, this conglomeration of resources should be sufficient to deliver quality education to all Pennsylvania students, however, irrefutable data suggests access to quality education is not evenly distributed in the Commonwealth.  Disparities in the allocation of educational resources have led to an historic challenge of the constitutionality of public education funding in the case William Penn School District v. Pennsylvania Department of Education.

Who brought the suit and what is the issue?

In 2014, six Pennsylvania school districts, several parents, the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools (PARSS) and the NAACP Pennsylvania State Conference filed a lawsuit in the Commonwealth Court against the Governor, various state education officials, and the legislature, alleging a systemic failure to uphold the state constitutional mandate of providing a “thorough and efficient system” of education to all Pennsylvania students. According to the suit, Pennsylvania’s then-used education funding model relied so heavily on local property taxes to fund school districts that it excessively and unconstitutionally disadvantaged low-wealth districts. 

Although school districts across the United States are funded by some combination of federal, state, and local dollars, the plaintiffs in this suit alleged that Pennsylvania was overly reliant on local money and was underfunded at the state level, thereby creating an unconstitutional disparity in funding based on local demographics.

Debra Gordon Klehr, Executive Director of the Education Law Center, and attorney for the plaintiffs, has explained, “[W]hen we filed the case, Pennsylvania was paying about 36 percent of the funds to school districts – about 10 percentage points lower than most other states. And that had a huge impact on our schools and inequity because districts then had to rely on local wealth to raise money they weren’t getting from the state.” Demographically diverse, the six petitioner school districts were selected because each had a high tax effort but low tax capacity, were efficient with what they had, but were still unable to provide for their students’ needs because of lack of state support.

The Trial

Before trial, this case toggled its way up and down the Pennsylvania appellate court system, ultimately landing in the Commonwealth Court for a trial on the issue of fairness and equity in funding.  The trial was held before President Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer and took place over four months in 2021.  The individual plaintiffs shared distressing stories of the failure of the public school system to educate their children.  They also presented data and expert testimony that demonstrated how Pennsylvania’s two-tiered funding system denied students in low wealth and low-income school districts a quality education.

The evidence adduced at trial demonstrated that all students in the Commonwealth need more funding, but students in the poorest school districts need significantly more funding than students in the wealthiest districts.  Students in the poorest quintile of districts need 38% more funding and the wealthiest quintile students need 11% more funding than they currently receive.  In order to meet proficiency goals in state assessments, school districts need an additional $4.6 billion in funding, with low-wealth districts being the most severely underfunded.  Their adequacy shortfall is 11 times that in the wealthiest quintile.[1]

The Court’s Ruling

On February 7, 2023, Judge Cohn Jubilerer issued a 768-page decision that recognized that “all children can learn and succeed when given the tools.”  She noted that education is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Pennsylvania Constitution, and that a “thorough and efficient” system of education includes such components as:

  • A sufficient, qualified, and effective staff

  • Safe and adequate school facilities

  • An adequate, modern curriculum

  • Modern instrumentalities of learning including technology and books

 Ultimately, Judge Cohn Jubilerer held that Pennsylvania’s funding model failed to provide these critical components in an equitable manner.  The Judge was persuaded by data demonstrating that students residing in school districts with low property values and incomes were deprived of opportunities and resources available to students residing in high property value and high-income districts. The Judge concluded that this disparity is not justified by any compelling government interest, nor is it rationally related to any legitimate government objective.  Therefore, the resultant disparities deprive students of equal protection under the law. In order to correct this injustice, the Court ordered state officials to change the way public schools are funded.  The ruling set the stage for a comprehensive overhaul of Pennsylvania’s public education funding formula; a task that would prove to be easier said than done.

Where do we stand now?

 The Court did not provide specific guidance on how to achieve constitutionality in public education funding; it would be up to the legislature and state education officials to develop a strategy to do this. The work began with the creation of a bipartisan panel of legislators and Pennsylvania education officials dubbed the Basic Education Funding Commission.  Throughout the fall of 2023, the Commission held public hearings and entertained public comments. In January 2024, the Commission adopted a plan that, if implemented, would make fundamental changes to the funding formula to not only increase spending across the board, but to address current inequities in spending.

On August 9, 2024, Governor Josh Shapiro signed into law the new funding formula which included a new funding formula and additional educational funds totaling $1.1 billion. 

Where do we go from here? 

While this is a good start, education advocates believe it is not good enough.  Lancaster School District Assistant Superintendent Matt Przywara is quoted as saying, “the increase doesn’t go far enough to answer the landmark 2023 court ruling that concluded Pennsylvania’s school funding formula was unconstitutional because it short-shrifted poorer school districts.”  He has accused Governor Shapiro and other state officials of not finishing the job.  Many agree with him.

But it is a start.  As citizens, we need to stay informed about this issue and hold our elected officials accountable to the Court’s 2023 decision and ultimately, the Pennsylvania Constitution.  How can an ordinary Pennsylvania citizen stay informed?  Here is a list of things you can do:

1.    Attend your local school board meetings. Ask questions of your elected officials!

2.    Study your local school board’s annual.

3.    Monitor your district’s performance on annual assessments.

4.    Stay informed about public school funding statewide at the following sources:

Fund Our Schools PA

The Public Interest Law Center

Education Law Center

As Thomas Jefferson would remind us – we must remain educated so can ensure a proper education for future generations.

 

[1] Case Spotlight: William Penn School District et al. v. Pennsylvania Department of Education Summary

 Written by attorney Kathleen Mahoney at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

http://www.Lawyers4Students.com

College Prep: What To Do To Ensure Success For Students With Disability Accommodations

With college application season in full swing, high school students with disability accommodations may be wondering how they can set themselves up for success in college. Firstly, it is important to know that students with IEP or 504 Plan accommodations can apply to college without disclosing their status, as colleges are  prohibited from asking about disabilities during their application processes. But once a student achieves admission into their college of choice, what should they do next? The IEP process ends after high school and so do special education programs, so colleges do not provide IEP’s. However, if a student had an IEP in high school, they could provide that IEP to their college and use it as a starting point to work out appropriate accommodations in college. The Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act do continue to protect the rights of college students with disabilities and do not end with high school. A student who had a 504 Plan in high school can similarly use that plan as a starting point for potential college accommodations. There are several other steps that, if taken early on, can make all the difference for a student’s success.

Perhaps the most important thing for college-bound students with disabilities to know is that there is no Child Find requirement in college. In K-12 education, the responsibility to assess the needs of children with disabilities and provide appropriate accommodations falls on the school. In college, the student carries the responsibility of self-disclosure and must formally request accommodations in order to receive any. In order to receive disability accommodations in college, students must first meet with the Disability Services Coordinator at their college.

Disability Services will conduct an individual evaluation of each student that seeks accommodations. No two students’ accommodations are required to be the same. For this reason, it is important for students to be prepared and to engage in self-advocacy when dealing with Disability Services. The sooner a student meets with Disability Services for their college, the better. We recommend setting up a meeting as soon as a student commits to their college to ensure that they have time to gather and provide any paperwork or records Disability Services may need in order to determine accommodations. 

A student’s relationship with Disability Services can influence their college experience and determine which accommodations are appropriate for the student. It is critical that students meeting with Disability Services advocate for themselves, understand what is being discussed, and feel empowered to ask questions and make requests during the process. At these meetings, students can expect to discuss their disabilities and how they impacts them, including how they impacts their experience in the classroom; accommodations they have had in the past and if they did or did not work for them; and any medical documentation of their disabilities including prior evaluations or assessments.

The more prepared a student is to request specific accommodations, the more likely it is that they will receive the accommodations they want. We recommend making a list of desired accommodations prior to meeting with Disability Services in order to ensure that Disability Services is aware of what accommodations a student feels they need. Below are three brief examples of common college-level accommodations:

1) Additional Time on Assessments

2) Quiet Testing / Separate Testing Area

3) Preferential Seating

Once a student is given accommodations through Disability Services, the responsibilities of the student do not end there. Students must continue to engage in self-advocacy and communicate with their professors in order to ensure their academic success. If an accommodation is not working, needs to be implemented differently or changed altogether, students should feel empowered to communicate that to their professors and Disability Services. Remember – self-advocacy is key, and engaging in these steps early on can set students up for success in their college careers!

 Written by attorney Megan Mitchell at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

http://www.Lawyers4Students.com

Toward A Consistent Approach to School Threat Assessments

It’s been over 25 years since the school shooting at Columbine High School, an event that shocked the conscience of the nation and sparked the national debate on gun violence in schools. But what have we learned in those 25+ years? Since the Columbine massacre in April 1999, there have been an estimated 2,311 school shootings. (1)

Around the nation, school threat assessment protocols have been put in place to evaluate risks and prevent the next tragedy. A threat assessment involves evaluation and classification of the threat (i.e., transient versus substantive) and following up with an appropriate response and intervention, including notifying parents and creating a written safety plan.

But even with the directives aimed at calculating and measuring the level of risk posed by a given statement or incident, in the first 3 months of 2024 alone, there were 77 incidents of school shootings in the United States. (2) “Prevention is the missing piece after every attack,” said Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost. “And the safety of children across our state depends on us plugging that gap.” To address that gap, Yost’s team created the Ohio School Threat Assessment Training, a combination of best practices from leading school-safety experts, including the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center. The training envisions a team approach, engaging community members, such as police officers and mental-health advocates, to prevent targeted violence and get help for troubled students.

Ohio House Bill 123 went into effect in March 2023, establishing the Safety and Violence Education Students (SAVE Students) Act, providing directives and protections for school safety and youth suicide awareness education and training. Every Ohio school district must now assemble a threat assessment team for each school serving grades 6 – 12, in the district. The SAVE Students Act also require school threat assessment teams to complete, upon appointment to a threat assessment team and once every three years thereafter, one of several approved training programs. These programs are offered free or of no cost to schools. These programs adhere to evidence-based standards and curriculum requirements, providing instruction in (1) identifying behaviors, signs, and threats that may lead to a violent act; (2) determining the seriousness of a threat; and (3) developing intervention plans that protect the potential victims and address the underlying problem or conflict that initiated the behavior and assessments of plan results.

When faced with a threat of violence against a school, staff or students, the team should follow some basic guiding principles:

  • Treat all threats seriously.

  • Investigate the incident promptly and efficiently.

  • Use support staff and external resources as a part of a multidisciplinary threat assessment team to evaluate threats.

  • Take appropriate disciplinary and criminal enforcement steps.

  • Document the threats and actions taken.

  • Enhance security measures, as appropriate, to ensure the safety of all students, staff, and facilities.

Following the SAVE Students Act directives ensures consistency and thoroughness in evaluating and responding to threats. Unfortunately, schools in Ohio have different approaches to threat assessments when faced with statements or actions that are perceived as threats. Some Districts follow the mandates of nationally accredited programs, putting many hours into investigating and evaluating every single threat, and creating a thoughtful response aimed at identifying true threats and supporting students. Other schools are less detail oriented in their investigation, and less consistent in their approaches to threat assessments. Such informality leads to more students facing discipline (and potential criminal charges) for threats that may not present the requisite risk of violence or cause for alarm.

Our schools would be safer and our students more supported if every school district undertook a consistent approach, based on the directives outlined in the Ohio School Threat Assessment Training Guide and Reference Manual.

1.        All shootings at schools includes when a gun is brandished, is fired, or a bullet hits school property for any reason, regardless of the number of victims, time, or day of the week. Naval Postgraduate School’s K-12 School Shooting Database, Riedman, David (2023). K-12 School Shooting Database.

2.        The United States government Office of Government Accountability maintains records evaluating the characteristics of school violence, relying on the Naval Postgraduate School’s K-12 School Shooting Database, Riedman, David (2023). K-12 School Shooting Database.

Written by attorney Ruth Pack-Adler at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

http://www.Lawyers4Students.com